special ed literacy
Recognizing Words in Print: Strategies and Activities – Rubric
Collapse All Recognizing Words In Print: Strategies And Activities – RubricCollapse All
Part 1: Strategies
24.5 points
Criteria Description
Part 1: Strategies
5. Target
24.5 points
Comprehensive summary of word recognition and print concepts strategies is provided, clearly identifying conditions under which each is to be delivered for elementary students with language delays or disabilities.
4. Acceptable
21.32 points
Sound summary of word recognition and print concepts strategies is provided, identifying conditions under which each is to be delivered for elementary students with language delays or disabilities.
3. Approaching
18.13 points
Marginal summary of word recognition and print concepts strategies is provided, weakly identifying conditions under which each is to be delivered for elementary students with language delays or disabilities.
2. Insufficient
16.9 points
Summary insufficiently identifies word recognition and print concepts strategies.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Part 2: Activities
21 points
Criteria Description
Part 2: Activities
5. Target
21 points
Activities outlined are ideal for reinforcing word recognition skills and print concepts for small group identified. Activities realistically incorporate a developmentally appropriate CCSS text and at least three of the strategies presented in Part 1.
4. Acceptable
18.27 points
Activities outlined are sufficient for reinforcing word recognition skills and print concepts for small group identified. Activities adequately incorporate a developmentally appropriate CCSS text and at least three of the strategies presented in Part 1.
3. Approaching
15.54 points
Activities outlined ambiguously reinforce word recognition skills and print concepts for small group identified. Activities weakly incorporate a developmentally appropriate CCSS text and at least three of the strategies presented in Part 1.
2. Insufficient
14.49 points
Activities outlined unconvincingly reinforce word recognition skills and print concepts for small group identified. Activities erroneously incorporate a developmentally appropriate CCSS text and at least three of the strategies presented in Part 1.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Part 3: Rationale
14 points
Criteria Description
Part 3: Rationale
5. Target
14 points
Rationale is comprehensive and professional in explaining how instructional choices meet the needs of the chosen small group.
4. Acceptable
12.18 points
Rationale is effective in explaining how instructional choices meet the needs of the chosen small group.
3. Approaching
10.36 points
Rationale ambiguously describes how instructional choices meet the needs of the chosen small group.
2. Insufficient
9.66 points
Rationale erroneously describes how instructional choices meet the needs of the chosen small group.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Research
3.5 points
Criteria Description
Research
5. Target
3.5 points
Research is supportive of the information presented. Sources are timely, distinctive and clearly address all of the criteria stated in the assignment.
4. Acceptable
3.05 points
Research is relevant and generally supports the information presented. All of the criteria stated in the assignment are addressed.
3. Approaching
2.59 points
Submission includes only 1 source, sources do not fully support claims, or sources are not all credible.
2. Insufficient
2.42 points
Sources provided do not support the claims of the presentation or are not credible. Required number of sources may not be met.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
7 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Target
7 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Acceptable
6.09 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
3. Approaching
5.18 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
2. Insufficient
4.83 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used.
1. No Submission
0 points
Not addressed.