Number 4
Project 5
On Tab 2, you did not calculate IPMTs. All the related results are changed.
3/2: Early submission. Cost of Capital Tab: In Cell L46, Tax Rate (TC) = 34% = 26% (Federal tax rate) + 8% (State tax rate). Payback Tab: In Cell E37, you should use WACC calculated from Cost of Capital tab. All related calculations should be changed. NPV and Projected After-tax Cash Flows should be the same amount of $191.1 for Year 0. You used the incorrect formulas when calculating NPV2. All related calculations should be changed. You did not calculate NPV value. Budget Projections Tab: Expense increases 2.5% = 0.025. You used the incorrect number in the related calculations. |
|
Feedback Date |
|
Mar 2, 2022 7:51 PM |
Feedback for Project 4
Submission Feedback |
|
Overall Feedback |
|
2/18: Tab 2 Annuities Q5, Q6, and Q7: You need to find the PV (which is sum of the PVs) of the cash flows. Tab 2 Annuities Q5, Q6, and Q7: You need to find the PV (which is sum of the PVs) of the cash flows. Tab 3- Capital Budgeting For Table 2-After-tax Cash flow Timeline: you should use the following formula. Projected After-tax Cash Flows (column I) = Projected Cash inflows from Operation (column B) – Projected Cash Outflows from Operation (column C) – Projected Federal Income Taxes (column F) – Projected State Income Taxes (Column G). Remember to correct related questions accordingly. |
Project 3
Sheet 2: You did not correct Cells B7, C7, C14 per the milestone feedback. On Sheet 4: Q1: Cell C13 = 139.16X60% per the provided information.
Q3: Using 100% for Sales in the calculations for Markup % on cost. On Question 3, the result of 54% is correct for markup % on cost. My suggested solution for Q4 is:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Submission Feedback |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Overall Feedback |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2/16: Second submission. Sheet 1: How did you get 88 in cell B67 and 213 in cell C69? Again, on Question #2: You should use the formula “Profit % = Profit / Revenue” when calculating Profit % for Total (in cell D70). Do not use ‘sum’ function at here. You did not correct Sheet 2 and Sheet 3 based on the feedback I posted. For example, how did you get 8.8 for Contribution Margin if you use the formula: Contribution Margin = Sales – VC. The same mistakes occurred in Sheet 4. Please carefully check your calculations. 2/15: Milestone submission. On Sheet 1: Table 2 should use Fixed cost per month “$3 million (instead of $10) per month” because Project 2->Tab 2->Question #3 states that “The variable cost per unit is $10 and the fixed costs are $3 million per month.” Please correct the related numbers on Question 2 accordingly. Question #2: “Marginal Contribution = Revenue – Variable Costs” is the correct formula you should use. Question #2: You should use the formula “Profit % = Profit / Revenue” when calculating Profit % for Total (in cell D70). Do not use ‘sum’ function at here. On Sheet 2: Sheet 3: For Question #1, Total Allocated costs (row 14) for Cost of Standard Boxes (Column H) should be the sum of the computed results in column H (=16.84). Your calculations for the Allocated cost per box are incorrect. For example, for Standard boxes, Allocated Cost per box = Total Allocated costs (16.84) / Number of boxes per year (108) = 0.16. Please correct your related calculations for both standard boxes and Deluxe boxes. On Sheet 4: |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feedback Date |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Feb 16, 2022 10:27 PM |
Project 1
Submission Feedback |
|||||||||
Overall Feedback |
|||||||||
1/22: The revision for the workbook is good. No need to resubmit it as a part of the entire project. 1/19: First milestone submission (incomplete submission). Under the Ratio Analysis tab: Double check your calculations for Earnings per share. Notice that the unit of the earnings is million. So, you need to time your computed result by 1,000,000. Change the unit of the Price-earning ratio accordingly. Under the Common-size Analysis tab: You did not standardize the Income Statement (below the Balance Sheet). Under the Cash Flow Analysis tab:
|
|||||||||
Feedback Date |
|||||||||
Jan 22, 2022 9:52 PM |
|||||||||
1/25: Notice that: The following arguments/conclusions are incorrect/inaccurate. “LGI seems to be more efficient in terms of sales.” “Asset’s efficiency can be assessed in terms of the liquidity ratio as well as Return on Assets (ROA). ” Notice that liquidity ratios are not used to assess the assets’ efficiency. Leverage ratios (not liquidity ratio) should be used in discussing the financial leverage. |